Social Networking Sites and the Evolution of the Casino Business

Social networking has changed the whole process of individuals’ and businesses’ communications in the sphere of online casinos. Today, all the important social media networks including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube, have become invaluable for online casinos to reach out to potential and current customers. These platforms allow the casinos to post content they have, advertise their games and foster a following.

Content Marketing

Online casinos deploy Social media marketing to offer users informative and entertaining content. This entails articles on blogging sites, videos, and infographics that advertise their games and inform and tip the players. News and Info content entrenches the gambler in tactical and strategic matters of the online casino.

Influencer Collaborations

Partnering with influencers is an active concept in the field of online casinos. Accounts that many people follow can become the target audience for casino games. The Kiwi players have local influencers used for the ads to create an identifiable influence on the audience.

Interactive Campaigns

In particular, describing activities that imply direct user engagement through social media sites, such as contests, polls, and live streams, has been impactful. These solicit user engagement and popularise this casino’s products. For instance, a live stream of a new game launch will normally attract a strong audience and interest.

User-Generated Content

Another method is to engage the players and solicit their stories and materials related to the casino. This offers credible references and gives a warm feeling, creating togetherness. Casinos utilise hashtags and challenges to engage people and encourage them to share their games and winnings.

Targeted Advertising

Social network targeting options are extremely developed so that casinos can address the necessary audiences. Online casinos can present ads according to users’ area, age, interests, or behaviour, which increases the chances of reaching the right target.

Engagement Activity of Social Media and Its Relation With Online Pokies

Online pokies are a favourite among New Zealand players. Social networks are employed to inform people about new online pokies in Australia and New Zealand, to show those popular winners and to give people an opportunity to get a bonus. Due to the graphics and simplicity of the pokies, they are suitable for social media platform advertising. Stories and pictures of pokies in operation can also be very provocative and instantly grab the attention of anyone browsing their feed.

Social Media and Its Impact

One of social media’s undeniable assets is that it allows interaction; therefore, it is perfect for communicating with players. That is why online casinos can continue to build and sustain close relations with their players through daily, weekly, or monthly updates, new content, and quick replies. Such consistent interaction is important in ensuring the players remain loyal to the game.

Various Campaigns Accompanied by Case Studies

Currently, many examples of online casinos use social media to communicate with the audience from New Zealand. Among them, it is possible to outline the promotion of new slot games on Instagram stories and posts. Thanks to advertising game features and promotions, the ability to attract many visitors is achieved, and such an approach works.

Another good approach is creating Facebook groups and pages where players can find handy tips, favourite questions, and exclusive events. Such groups develop connections and thus give the players a means of interacting with other casino-related entities and other players.

Conclusion

Social media has become necessary for most online casinos targeting New Zealand gamblers. Casinos can foster an active and vibrant online image using defined content marketing, proper collaboration with influencers, engaging and inviting campaigns and promotions, and paid advertisements. Thus, with such changes in the industry, the significance of utilising social networks to reach and maintain players will only rise.

The post How Online Casinos Use Social Media Platforms to Reach and Engage New Zealand Audiences appeared first on Press council.

In a significant decision, the Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Tanya Toailoa against Kiwiblog. The complaint involved allegations of inaccurate reporting, misrepresentation, and ethical breaches in a blog post. This article delves into the specifics of the complaint, the defenses put forth by Kiwiblog, and the final ruling by the Press Council.

Background

Tanya Toailoa, a community advocate and public figure, filed a complaint regarding a blog post published on Kiwiblog. The post discussed Toailoa’s involvement in a local advocacy campaign, and she contended that it contained multiple inaccuracies and portrayed her in a misleading light. Toailoa argued that the post not only damaged her reputation but also misled readers about the nature of her work and the campaign’s objectives.

The Complaint

Toailoa’s complaint was based on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: Toailoa claimed that the blog post included several factual errors about her activities and statements. She asserted that these inaccuracies undermined her credibility and misrepresented her efforts;
2. Misrepresentation: The complaint highlighted that the blog post took her statements out of context, resulting in a distorted portrayal of her views and the campaign’s goals;
3. Ethical Violations: Toailoa accused Kiwiblog of violating journalistic ethics, specifically concerning accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. She emphasized the detrimental impact of these violations on her personal and professional life.

Response from Kiwiblog

Kiwiblog responded by defending the blog post, asserting that it was based on information from reliable sources and reflected genuine editorial opinion. The blog’s author argued that the post was a legitimate exercise of free speech and an expression of personal views on a public figure involved in a public issue. Kiwiblog acknowledged that there might have been minor errors but contended that these did not substantially alter the overall narrative.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After a thorough examination of the complaint and Kiwiblog’s response, the Press Council issued its ruling. The Council focused on the principles of accuracy, context, and ethical standards in journalism.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the blog post contained several factual inaccuracies regarding Toailoa’s activities and statements. These inaccuracies were significant enough to potentially mislead readers;
2. Context and Fairness: The Council agreed that some of Toailoa’s statements were presented out of context, which misrepresented her views and the aims of the advocacy campaign. The lack of proper context contributed to a biased portrayal;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the need for Kiwiblog to adhere to ethical standards, even in opinion pieces. The Council concluded that the post did not meet the required standards of accuracy and fairness, thereby breaching journalistic ethics.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Toailoa’s complaint, determining that the blog post breached principles of accuracy, context, and ethical journalism. The Council recommended that Kiwiblog publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the importance of maintaining high standards of accuracy and fairness, even in opinion-based journalism. It highlights the responsibility of bloggers and media outlets to ensure that their content is both truthful and contextually accurate. The Press Council’s decision reinforces the need for diligent fact-checking and ethical reporting practices to maintain public trust in media.

The post Tanya Toailoa Against Kiwiblog appeared first on Press council.

In a recent ruling, the Press Council addressed a complaint lodged by Dr. Hinemoa Elder against The Dominion Post and Stuff. The complaint centered around an article that Dr. Elder claimed was misleading, contained inaccuracies, and breached ethical standards of journalism. This article explores the details of the complaint, the arguments from both sides, and the final ruling by the Press Council.

Background

Dr. Hinemoa Elder, a prominent Māori psychiatrist and advocate for indigenous mental health, filed a complaint against The Dominion Post and its online counterpart, Stuff. The article in question discussed Dr. Elder’s professional background and her views on mental health issues within the Māori community. Dr. Elder contended that the article misrepresented her statements and professional credentials, leading to potential harm to her reputation and misleading the public.

The Complaint

Dr. Elder’s complaint highlighted several key issues:

1. Misrepresentation of Credentials: Dr. Elder argued that the article inaccurately described her professional qualifications and experience, which could undermine her credibility as an expert in her field;
2. Misleading Information: She claimed that the article included statements that were taken out of context or incorrectly attributed to her, thereby presenting a distorted view of her opinions and work;
3. Ethical Breaches: Dr. Elder accused The Dominion Post and Stuff of failing to adhere to journalistic ethics, including the principles of accuracy, fairness, and balance. She emphasized the potential harm caused by the spread of misinformation about sensitive mental health issues.

Response from The Dominion Post and Stuff

In their defense, The Dominion Post and Stuff argued that the article was based on reliable sources and interviews, and that any errors were unintentional. They stated that they made efforts to present Dr. Elder’s views accurately and fairly, and that the piece was subjected to standard editorial processes.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After a thorough review of the complaint and the responses from The Dominion Post and Stuff, the Press Council delivered its ruling. The Council acknowledged the importance of maintaining high standards of accuracy and fairness in journalism, especially when covering topics of public interest and personal reputation.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article contained several inaccuracies regarding Dr. Elder’s credentials and statements. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about her expertise and viewpoints;
2. Context and Fairness: The Council agreed with Dr. Elder that some statements were presented out of context, which could mislead readers and misrepresent her positions on critical issues;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized that The Dominion Post and Stuff had a responsibility to ensure that their reporting met ethical standards of accuracy and fairness. The Council found that in this instance, the publication had fallen short of these standards.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Dr. Elder’s complaint, concluding that the article did breach principles of accuracy and fairness. The Council recommended that The Dominion Post and Stuff publish a correction and apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations in the original article.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the critical role of journalistic integrity and the importance of maintaining accuracy and fairness in reporting. It serves as a reminder to media organizations of their responsibility to uphold ethical standards, particularly when dealing with sensitive topics and individuals’ reputations. The Press Council’s decision reinforces the need for diligent fact-checking and balanced reporting to foster trust and credibility in the media.

The post Ruling: Hinemoa Elder Against The Dominion Post and Stuff appeared first on Press council.