Accuracy

One of the most fundamental principles of ethical journalism is accuracy. Journalists have a duty to report information truthfully and factually, verifying the accuracy of their sources and cross-checking information before publication. Inaccurate reporting can lead to misinformation and erode public trust in the media. By prioritizing accuracy, journalists uphold the integrity of their profession and provide the public with reliable information they can trust.

Fairness and Impartiality

Fairness and impartiality are essential principles that ensure balanced and objective reporting. Journalists should strive to present all sides of a story, giving voice to diverse perspectives and avoiding bias or prejudice. Fair and impartial reporting fosters informed public debate and allows readers to form their own opinions based on a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand. By maintaining fairness and impartiality, journalists uphold the principles of democracy and promote a healthy media ecosystem.

Independence

Independence is another core principle of ethical journalism. Journalists should maintain independence from outside influences, including advertisers, political parties, and other vested interests. This independence ensures that journalists can report stories without fear or favor, holding those in power accountable and serving as watchdogs for the public interest. By upholding their independence, journalists preserve the integrity and credibility of their reporting, safeguarding the democratic function of the media.

Accountability

Accountability is a crucial principle that holds journalists responsible for their actions and reporting. Journalists should be transparent about their methods and processes, acknowledging and correcting errors promptly when they occur. Accountability fosters trust between journalists and their audience, demonstrating a commitment to accuracy and integrity. By holding themselves accountable, journalists maintain credibility and demonstrate their commitment to ethical journalism.

Conclusion

Ethical journalism is guided by principles that uphold the highest standards of integrity, accuracy, fairness, and independence. By adhering to these principles, journalists play a vital role in informing the public, promoting democratic values, and holding power to account. In today’s fast-paced media landscape, it is more important than ever for journalists to uphold ethical standards and serve as reliable sources of information for the communities they serve.

The post Principles of Ethical Journalism appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Ewan Morris against the Northern Advocate. The complaint arose from an article published by the regional newspaper that Morris alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented his views and actions. This article provides an extensive analysis of the complaint, examines the responses from the Northern Advocate, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

Ewan Morris, a resident of Northland, raised concerns about an article published by the Northern Advocate. The article discussed a recent event involving Morris, but he claimed that it inaccurately portrayed his actions and misrepresented his intentions.

The Complaint

Morris’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: He argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding the events that transpired, which could mislead readers about his involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: Morris claimed that the article misrepresented his views and failed to accurately convey his perspective on the incident. He asserted that his statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: He raised concerns about the Northern Advocate’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from Northern Advocate

The Northern Advocate responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The newspaper acknowledged Morris’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced account of the incident.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from the Northern Advocate, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding the events involving Morris. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about his involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with Morris that the article misrepresented his views. It determined that certain statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, leading to a distorted portrayal of Morris’s perspective;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that the Northern Advocate had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the incident involving Morris.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Morris’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that the Northern Advocate publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in regional reporting. It highlights the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Ewan Morris Against Northern Advocate appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by St. John against Akaroa Mail. The complaint stemmed from an article published by the local newspaper that St. John alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented their services and actions. This article provides an in-depth examination of the complaint, evaluates the responses from Akaroa Mail, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

St. John, a well-respected emergency medical service provider, raised concerns about an article published by Akaroa Mail. The article discussed a recent incident involving St. John’s response, but they claimed that it inaccurately portrayed their actions and misrepresented their commitment to public safety.

The Complaint

St. John’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: They argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding their response to the incident, which could mislead readers about the quality of their services;
2. Misrepresentation: St. John claimed that the article misrepresented their commitment to public safety and failed to accurately depict their efforts to assist those in need during emergencies. They asserted that their statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: They raised concerns about Akaroa Mail’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from Akaroa Mail

Akaroa Mail responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from credible sources and that any discrepancies were unintentional. The newspaper acknowledged St. John’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced account of the incident.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from Akaroa Mail, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding St. John’s response to the incident. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about the quality of their services;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with St. John that the article misrepresented their commitment to public safety. It determined that certain statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, leading to a distorted portrayal of St. John’s actions;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that Akaroa Mail had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the incident involving St. John.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld St. John’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that Akaroa Mail publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in reporting incidents involving emergency services. It highlights the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post St. John Against Akaroa Mail appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Eliza Prestidge-Oldfield against The Dominion Post and Stuff. The complaint arose from an article published by the news outlet that Prestidge-Oldfield alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented her views and actions. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the complaint, examines the responses from The Dominion Post and Stuff, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

Eliza Prestidge-Oldfield, a resident of Wellington, raised concerns about an article published by The Dominion Post and Stuff. The article discussed a recent incident involving Prestidge-Oldfield, but she claimed that it inaccurately portrayed her actions and misrepresented her intentions.

The Complaint

Prestidge-Oldfield’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: She argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding the events that transpired, which could mislead readers about her involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: Prestidge-Oldfield claimed that the article misrepresented her views and failed to accurately convey her perspective on the incident. She asserted that her statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: She raised concerns about The Dominion Post and Stuff’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from The Dominion Post and Stuff

The Dominion Post and Stuff responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The news outlet acknowledged Prestidge-Oldfield’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced account of the incident.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from The Dominion Post and Stuff, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding the events involving Prestidge-Oldfield. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about her involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with Prestidge-Oldfield that the article misrepresented her views and failed to accurately convey her perspective on the incident. Her statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, contributing to a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that The Dominion Post and Stuff had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the incident involving Prestidge-Oldfield.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Prestidge-Oldfield’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that The Dominion Post and Stuff publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in reporting incidents involving individuals. It highlights the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Eliza Prestidge-Oldfield Against The Dominion Post and Stuff appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Peter Chapman against The Blenheim Sun. The complaint stemmed from an article published by the local newspaper that Chapman alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented his views and actions. This article provides a thorough analysis of the complaint, examines the responses from The Blenheim Sun, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

Peter Chapman, a resident of Blenheim, raised concerns about an article published by The Blenheim Sun. The article discussed a recent event in which Chapman was involved, but he claimed that it inaccurately portrayed his role and misrepresented his statements.

The Complaint

Chapman’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: He argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding his involvement in the event, which could mislead readers about his actions and contributions;
2. Misrepresentation: Chapman claimed that the article misrepresented his views and failed to accurately reflect his statements on the matter. He asserted that his statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: He raised concerns about The Blenheim Sun’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from The Blenheim Sun

The Blenheim Sun responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The newspaper acknowledged Chapman’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced portrayal of the event.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from The Blenheim Sun, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding Chapman’s involvement in the event. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about his role and contributions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with Chapman that the article misrepresented his views and failed to accurately reflect his statements. His statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, contributing to a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that The Blenheim Sun had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the event.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Chapman’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that The Blenheim Sun publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling highlights the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in local reporting. It underscores the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Peter Chapman Against The Blenheim Sun appeared first on Press council.

What Constitutes a Complaint?

A complaint to the Press Council typically arises when an individual or organization believes that a media outlet has breached journalistic standards in its reporting. This could include issues such as factual inaccuracies, misrepresentation of facts or individuals, lack of balance or fairness, invasion of privacy, or unethical conduct.

Lodging a Complaint

To lodge a complaint with the Press Council, individuals or organizations must submit a formal complaint detailing the alleged breaches of journalistic standards. This complaint should include specific examples and evidence to support the claims made. Complaints can be submitted online through the Press Council’s website or via email.

Review Process

Once a complaint is received, the Press Council conducts a thorough review of the allegations raised. This may involve seeking responses from the media outlet in question and gathering additional information or evidence related to the complaint. The Press Council’s Complaints Committee assesses the merits of the complaint based on established journalistic standards and principles.

Resolution

After careful consideration, the Press Council reaches a decision on each complaint. If the Complaints Committee finds that a breach of journalistic standards has occurred, it may recommend remedial action, such as issuing a correction, apology, or retraction. The Press Council’s rulings aim to uphold the integrity and credibility of the media while ensuring accountability for any lapses in journalistic ethics.

The post Understanding Press Council Rulings: A Guide to Complaints and Resolutions appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently deliberated on a complaint lodged by the Porirua Whanau Centre Trust against Porirua News. The complaint stemmed from an article published by the local news outlet, which the Trust alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented their activities and objectives. This article presents a detailed examination of the complaint, assesses the responses from Porirua News, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

The Porirua Whanau Centre Trust, a prominent community organization, expressed concerns regarding an article published by Porirua News. The article discussed the Trust’s recent initiatives, but they asserted that it inaccurately portrayed their efforts and misrepresented their mission to support the community.

The Complaint

The Trust’s complaint centered on several key grievances:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: They contended that the article contained factual inaccuracies about the Trust’s programs and services, which could mislead readers about their contributions to the community;
2. Misrepresentation: The Trust claimed that the article misrepresented their objectives and failed to accurately depict their commitment to serving the needs of local families and individuals. They argued that their statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to convey a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: They raised concerns about Porirua News’ adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from Porirua News

Porirua News responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It maintained that the article was based on information obtained from credible sources and that any discrepancies were unintentional. The news outlet acknowledged the Trust’s concerns but asserted that the article provided a balanced representation of their activities.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After thorough examination of the complaint and response from Porirua News, the Press Council reached its decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found merit in the Trust’s claims regarding factual inaccuracies in the article. The discrepancies identified were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about the Trust’s initiatives and contributions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council concurred with the Trust’s assertion that the article misrepresented their objectives and activities. It determined that certain statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, leading to a distorted portrayal of the Trust’s mission;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling underscored the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism. It concluded that Porirua News had fallen short of these standards in its reporting of the Trust’s activities.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld the Trust’s complaint, finding that Porirua News breached principles of accuracy and fairness in its reporting. As a result, the Council recommended that Porirua News issue a correction and apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling underscores the significance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in community reporting. It emphasizes the responsibility of news outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the importance of adhering to journalistic standards to uphold public trust and integrity in the media.

The post Porirua Whanau Centre Trust Against Porirua News appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Bob McLellan against the Upper Hutt Leader. The complaint arose from an article published by the local newspaper that McLellan alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented his views and actions. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the complaint, examines the responses from the Upper Hutt Leader, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

Bob McLellan, a resident of Upper Hutt, raised concerns about an article published by the Upper Hutt Leader. The article discussed a recent community event in which McLellan was involved, but he claimed that it inaccurately portrayed his role and misrepresented his views on the issue under discussion.

The Complaint

McLellan’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: He argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding his involvement in the community event, which could mislead readers about his actions and contributions;
2. Misrepresentation: McLellan claimed that the article misrepresented his views and failed to accurately reflect his position on the matter. He asserted that his statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: He raised concerns about the Upper Hutt Leader’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from Upper Hutt Leader

The Upper Hutt Leader responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The newspaper acknowledged McLellan’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced portrayal of the community event.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from the Upper Hutt Leader, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding McLellan’s involvement in the community event. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about his role and contributions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with McLellan that the article misrepresented his views and failed to accurately reflect his position on the matter. His statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, contributing to a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that the Upper Hutt Leader had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the community event.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld McLellan’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that the Upper Hutt Leader publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling highlights the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in reporting community events. It underscores the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Bob McLellan Against Upper Hutt Leader appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by Sarah Bronte against SunLive. The complaint arose from an article published by the online news platform that Bronte alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented her views and actions. This article provides a thorough examination of the complaint, evaluates the responses from SunLive, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

Sarah Bronte, a local resident, raised concerns about an article published by SunLive. The article discussed a recent incident involving Bronte, but she claimed that it inaccurately portrayed her actions and misrepresented her intentions.

The Complaint

Bronte’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: She argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding the events that transpired, which could mislead readers about her involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: Bronte claimed that the article misrepresented her views and failed to accurately convey her perspective on the incident. She asserted that her statements were taken out of context or selectively quoted to support a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Concerns: She raised concerns about SunLive’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from SunLive

SunLive responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The news platform acknowledged Bronte’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced account of the incident.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from SunLive, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding the events involving Bronte. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about her involvement and actions;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with Bronte that the article misrepresented her views and failed to accurately convey her perspective on the incident. Her statements were indeed taken out of context or selectively quoted, contributing to a biased narrative;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that SunLive had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the incident involving Bronte.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld Bronte’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that SunLive publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling highlights the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in reporting incidents involving individuals. It underscores the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Sarah Bronte Against SunLive appeared first on Press council.

The Press Council recently addressed a complaint filed by the Foxton RSA against the Manawatu Standard. The complaint stemmed from an article published by the newspaper that the Foxton RSA alleged contained inaccuracies and misrepresented their views and actions. This article provides a thorough examination of the complaint, evaluates the responses from the Manawatu Standard, and discusses the Press Council’s ruling on the matter.

Background

The Foxton RSA, a respected organization in the community, raised concerns about an article published by the Manawatu Standard. The article discussed a recent event hosted by the Foxton RSA, but they claimed that it inaccurately portrayed the details of the event and misrepresented their involvement.

The Complaint

The Foxton RSA’s complaint focused on several key points:

1. Inaccurate Reporting: They argued that the article contained factual inaccuracies regarding the organization’s role in organizing the event and the activities that took place;
2. Misrepresentation: The Foxton RSA claimed that the article misrepresented their views and failed to accurately reflect their commitment to serving the community and supporting veterans;
3. Ethical Concerns: They raised concerns about the Manawatu Standard’s adherence to ethical standards of accuracy, fairness, and impartiality in its reporting.

Response from Manawatu Standard

The Manawatu Standard responded to the complaint by defending the accuracy and fairness of its reporting. It argued that the article was based on information obtained from reliable sources and that any errors were unintentional. The newspaper acknowledged the Foxton RSA’s concerns but maintained that the article presented a fair and balanced account of the event.

The Press Council’s Ruling

After reviewing the complaint and the response from the Manawatu Standard, the Press Council reached a decision.

Key Findings

1. Accuracy: The Press Council found that the article did contain some factual inaccuracies regarding the details of the event organized by the Foxton RSA. These inaccuracies were deemed significant enough to potentially mislead readers about the organization’s role and activities;
2. Misrepresentation: The Council agreed with the Foxton RSA that the article misrepresented their views and failed to accurately portray their commitment to serving the community and supporting veterans;
3. Ethical Standards: The ruling emphasized the importance of upholding ethical standards in journalism, including accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. The Press Council concluded that the Manawatu Standard had not fully met these standards in its reporting of the event.

Outcome

The Press Council upheld the Foxton RSA’s complaint, determining that the article breached principles of accuracy and fairness in journalism. As a result, the Council recommended that the Manawatu Standard publish a correction and an apology to address the inaccuracies and misrepresentations identified in the ruling.

Conclusion

This ruling highlights the importance of accuracy, fairness, and ethical journalism in reporting community events and organizations. It underscores the responsibility of media outlets to ensure that their reporting is factually accurate, balanced, and representative of all perspectives. The Press Council’s decision reaffirms the need for rigorous adherence to journalistic standards to maintain public trust and credibility in the media.

The post Foxton RSA Against Manawatu Standard appeared first on Press council.